Search

Agricultural production is affected by plant diseases, affecting both quality and quantity. Yet, forecasting these diseases demonstrates its value for crop quality and reducing the chance of yield losses. The process of detecting plant diseases—whether by the naked eye or through conventional methods—is generally painstaking, time-consuming, and subject to substantial margins of error. This work presents a comprehensive exploration of diverse CNN architectures paired with distinct optimization algorithms, applied to olive disease identification via classification methods, and identifies the optimal model for an efficient disease detector. The exploration presents a collection of 5571 olive leaf images, gathered by hand in field settings across different regions of Morocco, and additionally includes a healthy class to identify olive diseases. Moreover, a primary aim of this research was to explore the interplay between CNN architectures and optimization algorithms as measured by accuracy and additional performance indicators. The peak score in the trained models reached 100%, while the peak score in experiments without data augmentation was 92.59%. A further emphasis of this exploration is the effect of optimization algorithms on neural network functioning. Based on the experiments, the MobileNet architecture with Rmsprop outperformed the other pairings in both detection performance and efficiency.

Cold chains are essential food-system infrastructures because they preserve safety, quality, nutritional value, and marketability from production to consumption. Despite their importance, many cold-chain operations still depend on reactive checks, delayed audits, and fixed temperature protocols that are poorly aligned with the biological variability of food products. This reactive orientation allows quality deterioration to accumulate invisibly until products arrive at inspection points, retailers, or consumers. The central problem addressed in this article is the absence of an integrated architecture that connects continuous monitoring, predictive analytics, and automated decision support across the full cold-chain pathway. Sensors may detect temperature excursions, models may estimate shelf life, and logistics systems may manage routing, yet these capabilities often remain fragmented. Without architectural integration, cold chains cannot become truly intelligent, adaptive, or self-correcting. The objective of this article is to propose an Intelligent Cold Chain conceptual architecture for real-time quality preservation, spoilage prediction, and loss prevention. The architecture is designed to transform environmental and logistical data into predictive quality intelligence and operational decisions. It positions the cold chain as a cyber-physical system in which sensing, prediction, decision-making, and coordination interact continuously. The article develops its architecture through a conceptual synthesis of peer-reviewed research published between 2017 and 2025. The synthesis draws from cold-chain logistics, food quality engineering, IoT monitoring, machine learning, digital twins, and supply-chain systems design. It does not report new empirical data, but instead integrates existing technological and theoretical insights into an original systems framework. The proposed architecture defines four functional layers: sensing, prediction, decision, and coordination. These layers specify how sensor streams are acquired, how spoilage risk is inferred, how corrective actions are recommended, and how information is shared across actors. The architecture provides a blueprint for moving cold chains from passive refrigerated corridors toward proactive, data-driven systems that preserve quality and reduce food losses.

Food security early warning systems increasingly draw on artificial intelligence, remote sensing, predictive analytics, climate information, crop monitoring, market indicators, and vulnerability data to identify emerging risks before they become severe crises. These systems are expected to provide timely signals about threats to food availability, access, utilisation, and stability across diverse ecological, economic, and social settings. Yet many early warning approaches remain fragmented. Climate risk, market instability, crop stress, and human vulnerability are often analysed in separate technical workflows, which can weaken interpretation, delay action, or produce alerts that are insufficiently linked to response capacity. This article develops a conceptual architecture for AI-enabled food security early warning systems. The architecture treats early warning as a layered process that connects data ingestion, risk-domain analytics, signal integration, uncertainty interpretation, alert generation, decision support, response targeting, and feedback governance. The proposed architecture explains how multi-source data and predictive models can be translated into interpretable and actionable food security warnings. It also emphasises that AI-enabled early warning can fail when data are incomplete, model outputs are opaque, vulnerable populations are underrepresented, or alerts are disconnected from institutions capable of acting.

Precision agriculture generates expanding volumes of sensor, machinery, remote-sensing, weather, soil, crop, livestock, operational, input-use, resource-use, and farm-management data. Although these data are commonly collected for immediate production purposes, they may also support sustainability reporting, environmental accountability, agricultural finance, insurance, and risk assessment. Such secondary use creates the possibility of a circular data economy in which curated farm data are responsibly reused across several applications and subsequently improved through feedback. This article proposes an original conceptual architecture for organizing these reuse pathways while preventing circularity from becoming uncontrolled extraction, opaque scoring, or unequal value capture. The architecture connects farm data generation and collection with quality and provenance review, metadata curation, consent and purpose limitation, data stewardship, interoperability, production analytics, sustainability reporting, finance and insurance applications, farmer protection, auditability, and feedback updating. It distinguishes analytical usefulness from implementation readiness and places governance gates before each consequential reuse pathway. Production reuse is treated as conditional decision support rather than a productivity guarantee; sustainability reuse is treated as bounded evidence rather than automatic reporting accuracy; and finance or insurance reuse is subject to data-quality, bias, fairness, transparency, and dispute requirements. The principal contribution is a structured circular data economy architecture that clarifies how agricultural data may circulate across domains while preserving farmer agency, contextual integrity, accountability, and explicit legal, financial, insurance, and deployment boundaries.

Generative artificial intelligence is creating new possibilities for conversational access to agricultural information, farm data, and decision-support resources. However, fluent interaction does not establish factual accuracy, agronomic validity, farmer trust, or operational safety. This article proposes an original conceptual architecture for generative AI-enabled farm advisory systems in precision agriculture. The architecture treats conversational decision support as a governed socio-technical process rather than a standalone chatbot function. It connects farm advisory use-case definition, farmer query interpretation, heterogeneous agricultural data inputs, curated knowledge retrieval, generative model layers, response grounding, advisory-output controls, uncertainty communication, human oversight, expert escalation, farmer feedback, monitoring, and controlled system updating. Sensor observations, remote-sensing products, weather information, soil and crop data, farm-management records, and textual agricultural knowledge are positioned behind data-quality, provenance, documentation, and access-control requirements. Foundation models, large language models, vision-language models, multimodal models, prompting, domain adaptation, and retrieval-augmented generation are treated as optional architectural components whose appropriateness depends on the bounded advisory task. The architecture further distinguishes factual checking from agronomic validity review and separates farmer-facing explanations from advisor-facing evidence assessment. Safety and trust requirements include risk classification, hallucination monitoring, privacy, cybersecurity, auditability, farmer autonomy, explicit advisory boundaries, and escalation pathways. The principal contribution is a structured framework for designing and evaluating conversational farm advisory systems without implying autonomous decision authority, validated agronomic advice, guaranteed trust, operational safety, or deployment readiness.

Precision agriculture depends on distributed data from sensors, remote sensing, machinery, crop and livestock monitoring, weather services, and farm-management systems. Collaborative model development can use these resources, yet central collection may intensify privacy, ownership, access, control, cybersecurity, participation, and secondary-use concerns. This article proposes a conceptual federated learning architecture in which farms retain raw data locally while contributing model updates to coordinated cross-farm learning. The architecture integrates use-case definition, stakeholder and governance mapping, farm-data sensitivity assessment, provenance and quality review, local node configuration, local model training, protected update exchange, secure aggregation, global and local evaluation, cross-farm validation, heterogeneity assessment, privacy safeguards, security controls, drift monitoring, auditability, and farmer feedback. It distinguishes horizontal federated learning from conditional vertical and transfer configurations and connects these principles to bounded agricultural use cases, including crop monitoring, disease detection, yield prediction, remote-sensing interpretation, livestock monitoring, and human-reviewed decision support. Secure aggregation, differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, and trusted execution environments are treated as context-dependent safeguards rather than guarantees. The contribution links decentralized model development with governance, accountability, communication constraints, non-identically distributed data, validation, monitoring, and claim boundaries. It supports research and design but does not establish certification, legal compliance, superiority, farmer approval, operational safety, or deployment readiness.