Search

Reliable estimation of crop yield is vital for refining farming operations and guaranteeing food supply. This investigation tested the capacity of machine learning techniques to estimate tomato yield using meteorological measurements, spectral reflectance bands, and vegetation indices subjected to different nitrogen levels and bio-stimulant applications to generate variation in crop development. UAV-mounted sensors captured spectral information across seven acquisition dates spanning October 27 to December 15, 2023, matching critical developmental windows: vegetative establishment (acquisition 1), anthesis (acquisitions 2 and 3), fruit set and enlargement (acquisitions 4, 5, and 6), and initial maturation (acquisition 7). Discriminating explanatory variables were selected via the Pearson correlation metric (r > 0.65, P < 0.05), incorporating Near Infrared (NIR), Red Edge, and Red wavebands, together with vegetation indices comprising NDVI, GNDVI, NDRE, and SAVI. Remotely sensed canopy signatures gathered throughout the fruit set and enlargement window (acquisitions 5 and 6) displayed the tightest association with harvested yield (r = 0.66–0.74), reinforcing the necessity of spectral intelligence from the middle to latter parts of the cycle. When comparing predictive algorithms, both linear regression (LR) and XGBoost yielded the strongest predictive skill, producing root mean squared error (RMSE) figures of 16.13 kg and 16.15 kg, respectively, matched with R² values reaching 0.63. Support vector machine (SVM) and decision tree (DT) implementations also delivered competent outcomes, achieving RMSE scores of 17.15 kg and 17.18 kg, respectively. By comparison, the deep learning architecture lagged notably (RMSE = 23.49 kg, R² = 0.23), plausibly attributable to data scarcity. This research spotlights the prognostic capability inherent in spectral wavebands and underscores the centrality of growth-stage-aligned spectral acquisition for yield forecasting.

The delineation of hazelnut plantations has the potential to assist land management and utilization strategies, thereby enabling the advancement of collaborative precision agriculture infrastructures. This investigation addresses the recognition of hazelnut cultivation by leveraging both optical and radar remote sensing. A comparative appraisal of various Machine Learning methodologies is conducted. The framework put forward harnesses multi-temporal information from the Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 archives, acquired over several years and processed in cloud computing environments. A data collection encompassing 62,982 annotated instances is furnished, with 16,561 cases assigned to the ‘hazelnut’ category and 46,421 to the ‘other’ category, gathered from 8 disparate geographic sectors within the province of Viterbo. Two distinct comparative assessments are performed: initially, a Nested 5-Fold Cross-Validation routine is used to fit, tune, and compare multiple Machine Learning classifiers confined to a single sector. In a follow-on trial, the classifiers were fitted on one sector and then validated against the remaining seven geographic sectors. The investigation confirms that AI-driven interpretation of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 imagery is a viable solution for hazelnut cartography. The outcomes indicate that Random Forest delivers the most robust generalizability, achieving peak results in the second trial, with 96% accuracy and an F1 score of 91% for the ‘hazelnut’ group.

Acquiring data across many locations and enabling fast decision-making are strengths of hyperspectral measurements. Nevertheless, a range of data processing approaches (Savisky-Golay [SG], first derivative [FD], and normalization) and modeling frameworks (partial least squares regression [PLS], weighted k-nearest neighbor [KKNN], support vector machine [SVM], and random forest [RF]) can be applied to establish the strongest link between physical observations and hyperspectral signatures. In this study, FD emerged as the top processing technique, while SVM was the leading model for estimating mean cotton (Gossypium spp., Malvaceae) height and node counts. Conversely, the integration of FD with RF achieved the highest accuracy in predicting cotton leaf area index, canopy cover, and chlorophyll levels throughout the growing period. Furthermore, outputs from models built with both SVM and RF corresponded closely to the pseudo-CHIME satellite wavebands, a process in which field-collected hyperspectral data were adjusted to the spectral intervals of an anticipated spaceborne hyperspectral sensor. The knowledge and outcomes supplied here will equip growers and other players in the cotton sector to execute swift, well-informed actions that could foster higher productivity and sustainable intensification.

Foundation models and multimodal artificial intelligence are beginning to reshape agricultural AI by enabling systems that can integrate images, text, sensor streams, remote-sensing data, environmental records, and management information. These approaches differ from earlier narrow models because they can reuse learned representations across related tasks and support richer forms of agricultural interpretation. Their potential relevance spans crop monitoring, disease detection, advisory services, automation, forecasting, and agri-food decision support. Despite this promise, the transfer of large-scale AI systems into agriculture remains complex. Agricultural environments are biologically variable, spatially heterogeneous, seasonally dynamic, and shaped by management decisions that are often poorly captured in available datasets. As a result, questions remain about data quality, annotation adequacy, domain adaptation, validation, explainability, governance, and deployment risk. This scoping review maps emerging applications, data requirements, and deployment risks associated with foundation models and multimodal AI in agriculture and agri-food systems. It focuses on how the reviewed literature frames model architectures, data modalities, application domains, validation needs, and governance concerns. The purpose is not to estimate pooled effectiveness but to chart the evidence landscape and clarify where knowledge is advancing or remains unsettled. The review uses a scoping approach to organise literature around key concepts, model types, data inputs, agricultural tasks, implementation settings, and responsible deployment concerns. It charts relationships among remote-sensing foundation models, vision-language systems, large language models, generative AI, multimodal data fusion, benchmark datasets, and agricultural decision-support systems. It also identifies gaps in field validation, interoperability, low-resource contexts, participatory governance, and trustworthy deployment. The review contributes a structured synthesis of how foundation models and multimodal AI may extend agricultural sensing, prediction, automation, and decision support. It highlights that technical capability alone is insufficient for responsible agricultural use. Robust data infrastructures, context-aware adaptation, transparent validation, and accountable governance will be central to whether these systems support sustainable and equitable agri-food transformation.

Digital agriculture technologies are increasingly positioned as tools for strengthening food security through improved sensing, prediction, automation, decision support, and resource management. These technologies are promoted as ways to help agricultural systems respond to climate stress, resource constraints, production volatility, and disruptions across agri-food value chains. Their potential relevance extends from farm-level monitoring to broader food-system coordination. Evidence on digital agriculture is distributed across multiple technology domains, including artificial intelligence, Internet of Things systems, robotics, remote sensing, and decision-support platforms. Food-security implications are often reported indirectly through productivity, efficiency, sustainability, resilience, risk reduction, or decision-quality outcomes. This dispersion makes it difficult to judge where the evidence is strongest and where food-security claims remain underdeveloped. This umbrella review synthesises review-level evidence on digital agriculture technologies in relation to food-security pathways. It examines how the reviewed literature connects digital agriculture with food availability, access, utilisation, stability, resilience, sustainability, productivity, and agri-food decision-making. The article focuses on review evidence rather than primary empirical findings. The approach compares review-level evidence across technology domains, outcome pathways, implementation conditions, and evidence gaps. It gives particular attention to whether digital agriculture evidence demonstrates direct food-security relevance or supports more indirect pathways through resource efficiency, monitoring capacity, operational timeliness, or improved decision support. It also distinguishes technical potential from demonstrated system-level benefit. The contribution of this umbrella review is to clarify where digital agriculture evidence is most developed, where food-security links remain indirect, and what future research is needed to evaluate digital agriculture as a contributor to resilient and inclusive food systems. The synthesis shows that digital agriculture should be assessed not only by technical performance but also by its capacity to support equitable, sustainable, and context-sensitive food-security outcomes.