Search

Climate stress is reshaping the operational conditions under which agricultural decisions are made. Drought, heat, flooding, salinity, and increasingly variable weather patterns intensify uncertainty around irrigation, fertilisation, pest management, crop selection, and yield planning. Precision agriculture has therefore become a central domain in which artificial intelligence is expected to support adaptive, data-driven decision-making. This systematic review examines how artificial intelligence decision models are used in precision agriculture under climate stress. The review focuses on three connected dimensions: the model families used to support decisions, the data sources on which these models depend, and the sustainability outcomes that are reported. The objective is to clarify whether current evidence supports the claim that artificial intelligence can deliver more resilient and sustainable agricultural management. The review synthesises peer-reviewed journal articles published. The study selection followed a PRISMA-oriented logic, using predefined search strings, inclusion criteria, and screening stages to identify relevant work on machine learning, deep learning, remote sensing, sensor-based agriculture, irrigation optimisation, yield prediction, crop disease detection, and sustainability assessment. No new empirical field data were generated. The evidence base shows rapid expansion in machine learning and deep learning applications, especially for yield prediction, irrigation management, crop monitoring, plant disease detection, and smart farming decision support. Satellite imagery, UAV data, IoT sensors, weather variables, soil information, and farm-management records appear as the dominant data sources. However, the review also identifies uneven attention to climate stress conditions, limited integration of long-term climate projections, and inconsistent reporting of sustainability outcomes.The review concludes that artificial intelligence for precision agriculture under climate stress is technically promising but methodologically fragmented. Most studies emphasise model accuracy, yield improvement, or input optimisation, while fewer evaluate environmental trade-offs, social impacts, farmer livelihoods, or long-term resilience. A more rigorous, transparent, and sustainability-centred research agenda is needed to move the field beyond predictive performance toward climate-resilient agricultural decision systems.

The convergence of artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things is creating new possibilities for adaptive farming systems. In agricultural settings, this convergence allows sensor networks, machine learning models, communication infrastructures, and automated decision support tools to operate as interconnected cyber-physical systems. Yet many current smart farming architectures remain technically fragmented and do not fully connect operational decisions with sustainability feedback. A central problem is that sensing, intelligence, agronomic reasoning, and sustainability assessment are often treated as separate system layers. Sensor data may support monitoring, machine learning may support prediction, and sustainability indicators may be reported after implementation, but these functions are rarely organised as a continuous adaptive loop. This separation limits the ability of farming systems to learn from environmental consequences and adjust decisions in real time. This article proposes a conceptual architecture for AIoT-enabled adaptive farming systems. The architecture integrates distributed sensor networks, edge-based intelligence, agronomic knowledge models, and sustainability feedback mechanisms into a closed-loop system. It is designed for farming environments where decisions must be locally responsive, scientifically grounded, and aligned with long-term resource stewardship. The article is based on a conceptual design synthesis of peer-reviewed literature published. The synthesis draws on agricultural IoT, edge computing, machine learning, crop monitoring, remote sensing, smart farming platforms, and sustainability-oriented digital agriculture. No new empirical data are presented. The resulting architecture specifies four interacting layers: sensing, edge intelligence, agronomic knowledge integration, and sustainability feedback. It defines how sensor observations move through edge analytics and knowledge-informed decision support before being evaluated against sustainability indicators that feed back into future control actions. The article contributes a systems blueprint for adaptive farming architectures that are not only intelligent and data-driven but also environmentally responsive and sustainability-oriented.

Smart farming is increasingly promoted as a pathway for improving agricultural productivity, resource efficiency, climate responsiveness, and data-driven decision-making. Its core technologies include sensors, digital platforms, machine learning, remote sensing, robotics, automation, and decision-support systems. These tools are often presented as mechanisms for making agriculture more precise, predictable, and adaptive. However, smart farming is not only a technical shift in agricultural tools. It also changes how knowledge is produced, how decisions are justified, how risks are distributed, and how farmers interact with platforms, advisers, suppliers, regulators, and markets. A critical review perspective is therefore needed to examine the social, institutional, political, and ecological consequences of agricultural digitalization. This article critically reviews smart farming as a socio-technical transformation rather than a purely technical modernization process. It examines how datafication, digital governance, farmer adoption, platform dependency, power asymmetry, and sustainability tensions shape the meaning and consequences of smart farming. The central argument is that smart farming should be evaluated through its effects on data control, farmer agency, institutional accountability, and ecological responsibility. The review synthesizes scholarship on digital agriculture, precision agriculture, smart farming, data governance, adoption barriers, farmer-centered challenges, sustainability claims, and responsible innovation. It does not treat technology adoption as a simple matter of farmer willingness or technical readiness. Instead, it situates adoption within broader arrangements of infrastructure, affordability, trust, knowledge, governance, and market pressure. The article contributes a critical synthesis of smart farming evidence and develops a forward-looking agenda for research and governance. It argues that smart farming futures should be designed around transparency, participation, interoperability, accountable digital systems, social equity, and ecological care. The review therefore reframes smart farming as a contested transformation whose benefits depend on how digital systems are governed, adopted, and made accountable.