Search

This investigation puts forward a novel intelligent farming platform that merges Internet of Things (IoT) capabilities with predictive modeling and self-regulating command systems to streamline watering processes and amplify resource productivity. The suggested design employs soil wetness, thermal, and atmospheric moisture probes interfaced with an Arduino-centered microcontroller unit, allowing irrigation to be triggered autonomously according to live sensor readings. Agricultural operators can remotely oversee and adjust watering cycles through portable devices, delivering both exactness and operational simplicity. The predictive model fuses historical data with current measurements to anticipate future irrigation demands, guaranteeing moisture delivery exclusively when truly required. Empirical on-farm assessments indicated a 30 % decline in water expenditure versus standard irrigation techniques, whilst upholding ideal earth moisture parameters. In addition, the framework markedly diminished workforce and power expenses, bolstering overall functional capability. By confronting the issue of hydrological shortage and advancing conscientious resource stewardship, this intelligent platform possesses the capability to enhance harvest volumes, curtail greenhouse gas discharges, and further eco-conscious cultivation methodologies. Within water-limited geographies, deploying this technological solution constitutes a pivotal stride towards enduring agricultural viability, indicating considerable scope for extensive implementation.

The push toward precision agriculture is increasingly driven by environmental considerations alongside economic pressures, fueling progress in variable-rate fertilization (VRF) technology. Although centrifugal fertilizer spreaders offer benefits such as mechanical simplicity, low cost, and high throughput, non-homogeneous spread patterns are becoming a primary obstacle to their broader use. An urgent investigation is therefore required into how particles behave and what variability patterns emerge when centrifugal VRF spreaders operate under multi-pass overlapped application, to boost both evenness of coverage and field accuracy. This paper examined and assessed the operational characteristics of a custom-built centrifugal VRF spreader that uses real-time crop status data for rice and wheat, applying the collection tray protocols detailed in ISO 5690 and ASAE S341.2 (1999). Distribution uniformity was evaluated by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV) from weighed fertilizer captured in standardized trays, thereby gauging the evenness of the applied spread profile. The obtained data indicated effective swath widths of 21.05, 22.58, and 23.67 m corresponding to target application dosages of 225, 300, and 375 kg/ha, respectively. In practice, multi-pass, overlapped spreading tended to deliver application amounts exceeding the intended rates, with within-swath CVs of 11.51, 9.25, and 11.28% for each respective dosage level. Field-based assessments of multi-pass, overlapped operations recorded a mean discrepancy of 4.54% between delivered and target rates, along with a mean lateral distribution CV of 11.94% across the implement’s working span, results that align with the performance criteria for transverse particle placement using centrifugal broadcasters. The insights generated by this work provide a conceptual reference point for the design refinement and technological evolution of centrifugal VRF equipment, carrying considerable applied and societal value in hastening their integration into everyday precision farming practice.

Smart agriculture increasingly combines artificial intelligence, sensor networks, automation, remote sensing, robotics, and decision-support systems to guide agricultural production and resource management. These technologies promise more precise monitoring, faster diagnosis, improved input targeting, and better coordination of farm operations. Their sustainability value, however, depends on how optimisation goals are defined and how decisions interact with ecological, technical, and social systems. A central problem is that algorithmic systems are often evaluated through yield gains, input efficiency, prediction accuracy, or operational performance. These metrics are important, but they do not necessarily reveal whether an improvement in one sustainability domain shifts pressure onto another. A farm system may become more productive while increasing water demand, energy dependence, biodiversity risk, or unequal exposure to technological burdens. This article develops a conceptual model of algorithmic sustainability trade-offs in smart agriculture. The model explains how yield, water, energy, biodiversity, and equity operate as connected outcome domains rather than isolated evaluation categories. It treats trade-offs as system-level tensions that emerge through optimisation objectives, data availability, decision rules, platform design, governance arrangements, and implementation contexts. The article contributes a systems-oriented framework for analysing when smart agriculture supports sustainability and when it redistributes environmental or social costs. It argues that algorithmic optimisation should not be treated as automatically sustainable simply because it improves efficiency or prediction. Instead, smart agriculture should be assessed by how its decisions balance productivity, resource use, ecological resilience, and distributional fairness.