Search

A novel hybrid AI-driven optimization architecture is proposed to advance climbing perch cultivation in intelligent aquaculture environments, aiming for simultaneous gains in yield and cost performance. By merging Taguchi experimental design with reinforcement learning and metaheuristic strategies, the system pinpoints the key environmental and operational drivers of fish growth and economic return. A multi-objective regression technique is deployed to fine-tune crucial variables, namely water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, feeding regimes, and stocking density. The RL-AMIS approach, leveraging Pareto front evaluation and TOPSIS, effectively reconciles the tension between expenditure and output. Empirical outcomes document a 15.3% drop in operating expenses and a 17.8% boost in growth efficiency relative to traditional practice. These insights confirm that AI-based optimization can strengthen scalability and flexibility within aquaculture operations, thereby advancing sustainable production agendas.

This research presents a comprehensive assessment of the latest YOLOv8 architecture’s suitability for object detection applications, specifically adapted for smoke and wildfire recognition, with particular attention to agricultural and environmental safeguarding. Every available YOLOv8 variant underwent initial fine-tuning on a field-specific dataset that covers diverse conditions essential for robust agricultural oversight. Performance indicators led to selecting the ‘large’ model (YOLOv8l) for deeper hyperparameter tuning. This model was subjected to meticulous hyperparameter refinement via the One Factor At a Time (OFAT) strategy, zeroing in on pivotal variables such as learning rate, batch size, weight decay, epochs, and optimizer. Knowledge gained from the OFAT phase was used to define search boundaries for the subsequent Random Search (RS). The ultimate model produced through RS displayed considerable advancement over the baseline fine-tuned version, boosting overall precision by 1.39%, recall by 1.48%, F1-score by 1.44%, [email protected] by 0.70%, and [email protected]:0.95 by 5.09%. The improved model’s performance was confirmed across a wide range of real-world photographs depicting different agricultural landscapes, affirming its robustness in smoke and fire recognition. These outcomes underscore the model’s trustworthiness and practical value in contexts vital to agricultural protection and environmental surveillance. This investigation, marking a notable leap forward in machine learning-based fire and smoke identification, lays a firm foundation for subsequent inquiries and innovations aimed at protecting agricultural areas and natural ecosystems.

Artificial intelligence is increasingly positioned as a transformative force for climate-smart agriculture, promising simultaneous gains in productivity, efficiency, and sustainability. Across agricultural policy, innovation systems, and digital farming markets, AI is presented as a solution to climate uncertainty, resource scarcity, labour pressures, and food-security demands. This review examines that promise through a critical lens. The dominant narrative surrounding AI-enabled climate-smart agriculture often treats optimization as a neutral technical process. Yet algorithmic systems do not merely improve farming decisions; they also define what counts as efficiency, which outcomes are prioritised, and whose knowledge becomes authoritative. This raises important questions about power, agency, and sustainability. The objective of this critical review is to interrogate the politics of AI in climate-smart agriculture. It synthesises evidence on the tensions between productivity, efficiency, sustainability, farmer agency, data sovereignty, and governance. The review asks how algorithmic optimization reshapes agricultural futures and who benefits from this transformation. The review draws on  peer-reviewed articles published across agricultural innovation, sustainability science, digital agriculture, artificial intelligence, and critical data studies. Rather than reporting new empirical data, it develops a critical synthesis of existing debates and identifies conceptual gaps in current scholarship. The review finds that algorithmic farming is not simply a technical evolution of precision agriculture. It is a contested political terrain in which sustainability goals, commercial interests, data infrastructures, and farmer autonomy are negotiated. A critical research agenda is needed to ensure that AI contributes to equitable, democratic, and ecologically resilient agricultural futures.