Search

Forest health is under mounting pressure from diseases driven by invasive pathogens, and the ability to detect these diseases early and precisely is vital for targeted, prompt forest management. Breakthroughs in spectral imaging and artificial intelligence have paved the way for novel approaches to plant disease identification in both crop and tree species. The present study employed the Dutch elm disease (DED; caused by Ophiostoma novo-ulmi) and American elm (Ulmus americana) pathosystem as a model to test the efficacy of two custom-fabricated, high-precision, portable hyper- and multispectral leaf scanners, paired with machine learning, as innovative instruments for forest disease surveillance. Hyper- and multispectral imagery was collected from leaves of American elm genotypes with varying degrees of disease susceptibility following mock inoculation and inoculation with O. novo-ulmi in controlled greenhouse conditions. Both classical machine learning and cutting-edge deep learning architectures were trained on extracted spectra and directly on spectral image volumes. Deep learning frameworks that leverage combined spectral and spatial information from high-definition spectral leaf images surpass classical machine learning approaches that rely exclusively on spectral data for DED identification. Within the deep learning framework, leaf margins and symptomatic lesions were accentuated as discriminative spatial cues for separating leaves originating from inoculated versus mock-inoculated specimens. Furthermore, the spectral and spatial signature profiles uncovered by the machine learning-based models corresponded to the DED susceptibility levels of the elm genotypes. While supplementary investigations are warranted to gauge transferability across other pathosystems, hyper- and multispectral leaf scanners integrated with machine learning show considerable promise as emerging tools for disease phenotyping in tree species.

Food recalls remain essential instruments for protecting public health when unsafe, contaminated, mislabelled, or otherwise non-compliant products enter food supply chains. Yet many recall systems still operate primarily as downstream corrective mechanisms after hazards have already moved through production, distribution, retail, food service, or household channels. This reactive orientation can delay containment, increase exposure, and weaken public confidence in food safety governance. Conventional recall management is increasingly challenged by globalised sourcing, rapid distribution, e-commerce, multi-ingredient products, outsourced processing, fragmented traceability records, and uneven information sharing among actors. Weak risk signals may appear in laboratory data, consumer complaints, inspection findings, supplier records, online reports, or public health surveillance before they are recognised as recall-relevant evidence. When these signals remain disconnected, recall decisions may occur only after risk propagation has already widened. This article proposes a conceptual model for intelligent food recall systems that integrates early detection, risk signal fusion, network propagation mapping, coordinated response, accountability, and communication feedback. The model reframes recall management as a system intelligence problem rather than a narrow compliance, logistics, or product-removal task. It explains how anticipatory analytics and network-aware decision support can strengthen recall scope definition, actor alignment, and public communication. The contribution of the article is a structured conceptual framework for designing recall systems that are more anticipatory, traceable, coordinated, accountable, and adaptive. The model does not report new empirical data; rather, it synthesises food safety, artificial intelligence, supply-chain traceability, risk communication, and crisis-response perspectives into an integrated recall intelligence architecture. It offers a foundation for future empirical testing, digital system design, regulatory innovation, and food-industry implementation.